30 January 2009

The Official Sport Is A TV Show Premier League Goalkeeper Power Rankings -- January 2009


Welcome to a new feature here on Sport Is A TV Show, our Official Premier League Goalkeeper Power Rankings. We feel that the creators and the goal-scorers, the flamboyant and flairy of the game, get too much of the kudos, endorsement deals and unfeasibly-plasticised lady-friends. Through these rankings, we hope to bring some attention to those who, through no fault of their own, were born without the capacity to be any good at proper football but who love to scream "Keeper's!" and glare threateningly at their own teammates.

And what an perfect time to begin. On Tuesday, Edwin van der Sar extended his run without conceding a Premier League goal to 17 hours and 12 minutes, eclipsing the previous record set by Petr Cech in 2004/5. (We tried to find out whether any goalkeeper from the football's dim prehistory had a run better than this but, as we know, much of the game's history was lost in the Great Record Purge of 1992.) This spectacular achievement has had quite an impact on our inaugural table.


On which. We polled a panel comprising some of the planet's most omniscient deities and superheroes and fed the results into our hypercomputer, Maisie. (If you're unfamiliar with Maisie's previous work, have a look at this.) Using a set of formulae devised by Maisie herself, which are so complicated that even I don't understand them, this information was processed for a full twenty-four hours (with a ten-minute paper-jam-related interruption) until our rankings were produced. So, how exactly does van der Sar fare?


1. Shay Given
2. Shay Given
3. Shay Given
4. Shay Given
5. Shay Given
6. Shay Given
7. Shay Given
8. Shay Given
9. Shay Given
10. Edwin van der Sar

Well done, Edwin!

Read more...

28 January 2009

Masal x100

Actually, if you thought the Masal thing was interesting, see this, about a hoax which duped the medical establishment for thirty-four (34) years. Two words: "cello scrotum".

Read more...

If...

If...

  • ...you imagine the posts on this site being read by the author in a voice somewhere between Richard Burton and Laurence Olivier and want to have your illusions brutally obliterated**;

  • ...you want to hear an application of the technique I used for my French and Irish oral exams at school, ie. keep talking and don't stop until the examiner shuts you up;

  • ...you are absolutely desperate to hear the Masal Bugduv story yet again...

...then tune in to CBC's As It Happens today, where I -- assuming the producers haven't seen sense in the meantime -- will be putting in an appearance. The show runs from 6:30-8pm Eastern Time, 11:30pm-1am GMT. My descent into media whoredom begins here!

In the meantime, continuing the theme of my own post titles putting songs in my head, here's a couple more:




**Actually, whatever I sound like in the interview, I don't sound like that.

Read more...

Everybody's got something to hide except for me and my donkey

Well, well, well. Welly, welly, welly. Wellisy, wellisy wellisy...

As Brian mentioned in his Slate piece on Masal Bugduv, he was in contact with somebody claiming to be responsible for the whole episode. In trying to establish whether this person was genuine, it was suggested that he might log in to one of the message boards in which the fake AP stories appeared and post a message with an agreed wording. Today, 606 user Galwaygooner, author of many of these stories, posted this:


So, it appears we know whodunnit. There's more to come on this, with any luck.

Read more...

26 January 2009

Your chance to own a piece of history


Some of you may be unaware that the Masal Bugduv hoax was not the first I've uncovered. In between my providing you with top-notch bloggery, I have been ruthlessly exposing the LIES that THEY don't want you to know about:

  • Last year, while browsing in a second-hand bookshop, I came across an original copy of the New Testament. After paying the 20 quid asked and teaching myself ancient Greek, I discovered a most extraordinary thing: this Jesus fellow everyone has been going on about did not actually exist. In fact, for nigh on two millennia, billions of people have been worshipping a racing pigeon named Walter. Read in this light, the Gospels are a simple fable about being nice to others or always eating your greens or something. This is an easy mistake -- the ancient Greek for "Walter the racing pigeon" is very close to that for "Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ" -- but it has proved to be a major embarrassment to the Christian churches. Some simple investigation showed that the Wikipedia page for "Jesus" was created at a computer in the Vatican. The Catholic Church strenuously denied everything, and Pope Benedict XVI declared that anyone who so much as looked at a copy of the New Testament would face excommunication. The Eastern Orthodox churches acknowledged the error and promptly disbanded.

  • Everyone knows the moon landings were faked, but the real reason for this only came to light after I went undercover at NASA in the spring of 2005. I used my PhD in aerospace engineering to attain a high-level post in the organisation, giving me access to their super-top-secret data files, in which I found out that the moon is nothing more than an optical illusion caused by the interference of sunlight with the radioactive Van Allen belt.

  • The world is run by the Freemasons. The Freemasons are run by the Illuminati. The Illuminati are run by David Icke.

  • Geoff Hurst's second goal for England against West Germany in the 1966 World Cup final didn't even cross the line.

  • You know that man you've been calling "Dad" all these years? Well...

All of this and much, much more can be found in my forthcoming book, Fredorrarci: Daring to Doubt. In this shameless cashing-in on my new-found global fame, you will read painstakingly-detailed accounts of my many efforts to bring to light the shocking conspiracies which keep you -- yes, you -- the dribbling idiot you are. It is also a memoir, chronicling the experiences which made me the magnificent and gorgeous human being that I am today:

"It's a boy," said the doctor as he handed me to my mother, "and he weighs a healthy seven pounds four ounces." "Excuse me, doctor," I said, my wonderfully mellifluous tone evident even at that age, "I think you'll find the scales read seven pounds five ounces?" He weighed me again. "Why, the little tyke is right! I think we know what this one is going to do when he grows up, don't we? I reckon he'll travel the globe revealing high-level hoaxes and cock-ups to those less overwhelmingly gifted than he, casting a ruthlessly doubtful eye over the evil-doers of this world, possibly reporting his findings on some medium we can but dream of in this innocent age."

And you know something? He was right.

So there you have it: Fredorrarci: Daring to Doubt, published next month, available at all book shops lucky to stock it. Now, if you don't mind, I'm off to be fitted for my suit for my Légion d'honneur presentation. Get off my property.

Comic: xkcd

Read more...

23 January 2009

In brief

Masal Bugduv. Brian Phillips. Slate. Go!

Read more...

20 January 2009

Another hoax?

So Masal Bugduv doesn't exist. And according to Richard Whittall, not many players do, at least not in the way we often think they do.

So someone answer me this: what about Andrei Arshavin?

I mean, that delightful footballer we saw against Sweden and Holland last June -- if they could fake parts of the Olympic opening ceremony, couldn't he just have been a hologram or something? Were we all part of some mass hypnosis experiment? Is the media conference announcing his arrival at Arsenal on February 1st going to be interrupted by a Russian TV crew bursting into the room and saying "Smile, you're on Candid Camera!"?

Read more...

The other side glass

This isn't the Masal Bugduv update promised a couple of posts ago -- that's still to come. Meanwhile, here are a few Massi morsels.

I'm not sure if anyone else has reported this, but When Saturday Comes acknowledged their error last Friday in their Weekly Howl email newsletter (UPDATE: link), pointing out that the article in which they trumpeted Bugduv (is it right to mention an imaginary person only by their surname?) was "otherwise illuminating". Which it was. Unless...

Unless the whole piece was a sham! Maybe there isn't really a "Transdniestria separatist movement" at all! Maybe there's no such place! Sure, there's a Wikipedia entry for it, but what does that prove? Well? Well?...

No, no...sorry about that. Of course it's real. But do you see what all this has done to me?

WSC linked to a similar story from 2003, when Leeds were linked to a player who only existed on the Championship Manager database. Unless...no, just kidding.

Speaking of The Wik, as probably no-one calls it, your favourite phantom footballer now has his own page.

The blog The Freeman's Journal has detailed the whole affair in handy interactive timeline form.

Somehow, amidst the various stuff that's been written about all of this, I stumbled upon the Vietnamese version of the BBC daily transfer gossip round-up. Now, writing about the strange qualities of automated translation is cheap and lazy, I know. But I was quite taken with some of Google Translate's brave efforts to fill the southeast-Asian-shaped gap in my education. (Here is the English version.)

"Gossip cloumn" becomes "chili party" (though in the sidebar it's "party margins").

In a civil service office somewhere, Angelos Charisteas didn't score the winner in the Euro 2004 final, he "has recorded the promotion decision for Greek team at Euro 2004 resolution".

From now on, instead of "broke down in tears", I'm going to use "turned khoc".

West Ham are "China's team West Ham". Chelsea are "China defense club Chelsea". Hey, it's going to happen sooner or later -- may as well get used to the idea.

My favourite, though, is the translation for "transfer gossip":

Rumor anticipate the demise

Read more...

This is sum unfriendly

Note: I began this last Tuesday and intended to finish it the following day, but I fell asleep and had the weirdest dream...I suppose it has some resonance with certain imaginary-footballer-related events of recent days.

So, have you been following it?

Have you been intrigued, enthralled, enraptured by the back page headlines grabbing you by the lapel and shaking you into thinking that some exotically-named hotshot is practically pining for your team's well-appointed out-of-town training facility?

Have some hot, hot, HOT transfer rumours set light to your house of football fandom in the last few months, only to be kept under control by the market's legislated inactivity, before someone went and opened the transfer window and whooshed it all up again into a backdraft of believability?

Have you been keeping your ear to the ground so much that a worm has made its way through your auditory canal and burrowed into your brain, causing you to imagine that your cash-strapped club's recently deceased great aunt has left it with the returns from a lifetime of careful but successful investment which, combined with the coppers it found while cleaning underneath the cushions (it's amazing how much rubbish you find under there -- discarded contracts, agents' receipts, arrears notices...), will be splurged on a striker who scored a couple of goals in the Bundesliga last year, has had a few injury problems, but for whom big things have been predicted, once, in a World Soccer profile in 2003?

It's funny to think back to when the international transfer window was introduced. One of the arguments against it was that we would be deprived of a vital part of our daily football conversation if the newspapers had no transactions to pass on. Such concern for our purveyors of hedged bets and imaginative reportage was woefully misplaced, though strangely touching. (What it was strangely touching I'm not quite sure.) It turns out that the window, as installed by Honest Sepp's Double Glazing -- check your wallet and knicker drawer -- is not quite as effective at keeping out the noxious fumes from the rumour rendering plant next door as had been expected.

(Okay, that's enough transfer-window-as-actual-window metaphors for now.)

Perhaps I shouldn't scoff. In fact, I really should declare my hand at this point -- people who live in shoddily-constructed glass houses shouldn't hurl meticulously-honed, award-winning invective, after all. Last summer, just when I thought I was over any naive residual faith in the healthy properties of the rumour mill's produce, I succumbed. For three months I gorged on gossip columns and aggregated tittle-tattle round-ups in the hope of...well, frankly, I don't know what I was hoping for. This shame lasted all the way up to the 31st of August, when I spent the hours before midnight repeatedly refreshing a deadline-day liveblog eager to be continually slapped in the face by a sequence of blockbuster deals, each more astonishing than the last. All I got in that department was Robinho's move to Eastlands. Steve Finnan signing for Espanyol was very interesting, but not quite what I was after. All in all, as the clock struck twelve, I felt like I had been stuffing my face with very cheap chocolate for six hours.

Robinho's move to Man City should have felt huge. And it did, for a while. But coming at the end of a summer of silly, silly conjecture, and after a few hours through the unstoppable spinning news cycle, it all seemed a bit meh.

And in January -- or to give it its proper title, as Austin Kelley does, "European transfer window" -- the madness is all the greater for being concentrated in a few short but oh-so-long weeks. The meh is greater, too. Tell me you're following every detail of Arsenal's impersonation of a desperate GI whose head is turned by Andrei Arshavin's "me love you long time" come-on and I will call you a lying git, with respect, sir/madam.

There's not just the whack-a-mole speculation to contend with, either. One must wrap one's head, with its furrowed brow and quizzical mouth and deep, dreamy eyes (speaking for myself), around the money issue. For me, it's not about tutting over the very fact that a footballer can be deemed more valuable than many financial institutions. It's not that this isn't one of our kooky li'l species' many, ahem, endearing eccentricities; but there are only so many times one can sigh at the follies of the free market ethic as applied to sport, like the person of vaguely leftist persuasion one is, before one realises that one has just renewed one's satellite subscription again. Besides, that horse probably bolted down the road to Middlesbrough with Alf Common.

My problem is in judging the worth of a player in currency form. When a conversation turns to whether Player A is really worth the £15 million that Club B has offered for him, or I hear some podcasters debate whether Player X should be earning 10 grand more per week than Player Y, my ears glaze over, or whatever the auricular equivalent is. If, in Hollywood, nobody knows anything, then in football, nobody knows anything. Boards lob bunches of banknotes around hoping they will hit someone who will be the key to a slightly higher finish in the table. Assessing it as if it were a logical system is, well, illogical.

As well as this, we're talking about very large amounts of wonga. I don't know about anyone else, but I find it difficult to take it all in. What does one make of a footballer having his annual salary increased from £3.5m to £4m? Allow me to demonstrate this situation algebraically:

S + S = S,

where S = a shitload of money.

I might find it easier to care if it all had to fit under a salary cap. But then again, have a look at this. Those aren't the NBA salary cap rules -- it's the simplified version of the NBA salary cap rules, and it's still more complicated than that loan agreement you didn't read properly and is the reason you're currently reading this over someone's shoulder at the public library. (Two Sport Is A TV Show readers in the same place? Say hi!)

What I should really do is just not read any of this stuff (or write a thousand words on it...) -- just close my ears until the window shuts whereupon I would simply inspect a list of the damage and get on with my life. But I'm nosey and weak-willed and won't be able to resist having the odd wee sneaky peek over the next few weeks. I know, I know, I'm terrible. Hey, we're all tools of the players' agencies anyway. There's a thought to finish on...



Panning-for-gold image by filo1000.

Read more...

18 January 2009

Bah bah bah-dah, bah bah bah

There have been three songs rattling around my head these past few days. One is 'Lost in the Supermarket' by The Clash, thanks to Brian. Another is Elvis Costello's 'My Science Fiction Twin', possibly because it's kind of about an imaginary person (or maybe just because it's a good song). Mainly, though, thanks to the title of this post, it's been the following. Luckily, I have the greatest taste in music in history, so I don't mind.



By the way, an update on the case of You-Know-Who will appear at some stage. Stay tuned.

Read more...

16 January 2009

Winston Smith, just doing his job


Here's something I should have put in the Soccerlens Masal Bugduv piece before The Times made him an unperson...

Saved on Wednesday afternoon at 1526 GMT, if you're interested:




(Click on images for full-size view.)

Read more...

15 January 2009

Hi, Pulitzer Prize

My first, and probably last, foray into investigative journalism -- if some Google searches and email exchanges count as investigative journalism -- is now up on Soccerlens. Learn:

*why the world's thirtieth most promising young footballer is not what he seems!

*that you shouldn't believe everything you read!

*some basic Moldovan geography and Irish vocab!

So, off with you, then.

Read more...

09 January 2009

Appendix: Darts, language and snobbery all tied up in a Stephen Fry-shaped bow



This may well have been in some recess of my mind egging me on as I wrote the previous post (watch from about 5:45). Just because Stephen Fry says something is so doesn't necessarily make it so, of course. But on this occasion, it certainly is so. Oh, it's so so (but definitely not so-so).

Fry has also written a wonderful, meandering essay about language, including a glorious attack on grammar-and-punctuation pedants ("Well sod them to Hades. They think they’re guardians of language. They’re no more guardians of language than the Kennel Club is the guardian of dogkind."). Read it or, better still, listen to him read it for you.

Returning to darts, go here to see that rare creature: a nine-dart finish at a world championship. It's remarkably disconcerting how an achievement which would cause most people to instantly vaporise with sheer excitement is treated like no big deal by Raymond van Barneveld. Contrast his reaction to that of the only other man to accomplish the feat, Paul Lim:

Read more...

08 January 2009

Ich trinke Schampus mit Lachsfisch Lager mit Chips!

...oder Benylin mit Paracetamol...


No, no, I'm fine, thanks for asking. Don't worry about me, I'm only riddled with cold virus and can barely stand up for need of a solid vertical surface against which to prop my dizzy self. I'll get my own grapes and fancy chocolates, then.

As Johan Cruijff almost said, every advantage has its disadvantage. For instance, my voice is currently a good flattened fifth below its normal pitch. Each time I speak, I set off seismometers in Peru and cause any woman in earshot to blush. Yet, as if nature realises that such wanton sexiness could well be so powerful as to send the planet into reverse rotation, my body is full of snot from the chest upward, rendering me horrid to all living beings.

But there is at least one incontrovertible pleasure to be had about being laid up at this time of year, and that's having the chance to watch darts.

That's right -- wondrous, glorious darts. And this isn't the Nurofen Cold & Flu talking, either. I love darts. I love how it's easy to play but astoundingly difficult to play well. I love how it's not enough just to score big if you can't finish well (like how in golf, you can be terrific from tee to green, but if you can't putt well, you may as well have stuck to that book-keeping course you abandoned to pursue your dream). I love how it's unforgiving of error: so narrow are the margins that a slight mid-match deterioration in form can be catastrophic, and a small improvement can turn swill into wine (or cheap lager, anyway). I love the crap walk-on music and the super slo-mo replay of the dart shuddering as it hits the board.


I love how, even though the action moves at a pelt, it is technically a stop-start game; it allows a player to think himself into a useful or self-sabotaging frame of mind before each dart. I love how, even though a player is trying to do better than his opponent, he is basically playing against himself: wrestling with his own mind and whatever capricious force seems to be guiding his darts.

I love how, at its best, it is almost unbearably dramatic. There is little better than a high quality, neck-and-neck darts game. Most of all, perhaps, I love how it's presented in such a simple form that anyone can understand it, even if tanked up on fizzy ale (or strung out on cough medicine).

But I'm 'hip' to "what's what". I keep an '''ear''' to the ''''ground''''. I'm aware of the great questions of our age, the conundrums which tax the cerebral fortitude of our finest thinkers: is string theory really the key to understanding the differences between general relativity and quantum mechanics? How can the conflicts in the Middle East possibly be resolved? Don't the verses of 'What's Up?' by 4 Non Blondes sound just a tad too much like Bobby McFerrin's 'Don't Worry, Be Happy' to be a co-incidence?

But it seems that the greatest riddle of all is: is darts a real sport?

This we know because it was earnestly debated on BBC Radio Five Live's late morning phone-in programme the other day. (Why was I listening to that show? Because I'm an idiot, okay? Happy now?) The sages who contributed put forward several claims as to why it is not a sport: it's just a pub game, no better than shove ha'penny; its prevalence of fat biffers, one ex-world-champion example in particular; it's not a sport if you don't have to change your shoes to play it; one can't put it in the same category as archery because the latter has traditionally been the domain of the upper classes ("the sport of kings", as the caller in question put it).

Why they worry? Is it not a wonderful thing that human ingenuity has been able to channel our natural instincts for play and competition in so many ways? It may be that one derives less pleasure from someone throwing a flighted spike at a sisal disc than from some people kicking an inflatable orb around a field, but that does not make the former less legitimate. They're just different manifestations of the same thing.


What I'm really intrigued about is why it should be so important to distinguish between sport and games. To take the darts/archery comparison mentioned above: what separates the two activities? What renders one a 'sport', dignified by its presence at the Olympic Games, and the other merely a 'game', of a lower class, fit for scoffing at and little more?

Forgive me if I come across as overly fanboyish in my willingness to defend darts, but I detect some snobbery. Snobbery comes in various guises. For example, as I was saying to the Rainiers the other day, if one were to compare the award I won to that which you...oh, what's that? You didn't win an award? (Chuckles) Oh...oh dear! What a shame! Just leave, leave right away. And do curtsey on your way out, won't you?

The darts-is-not-a-sport line reminds me more of those who would have us believe that English is a citadel that needs defending from the linguistic barbarism of txtspk and apostrophe abuse and the neglect of a coccygeal remnant of an obsolete case system. 'Sport' is not a concept so precious that its definition needs to kept scrupulously pure. Darts is not "beneath" anyone or their favourite sport. Allowing darts to be considered a sport will downgrade your own chosen passion -- be it a code of football or a racquet sport or a racing sport or whatever -- not a jot. There is no need for neurotically Trussian fussiness because, to repeat, it's all the same thing and -- more importantly -- it's all great. There is something in every sport, on some level, which is attractive to anyone who gets sport, who has found a way into a sport -- any sport -- and who isn't pathologically averse to the idea of sport. If you don't get a specific sport, even on a very basic, I-kinda-see-why-people-might-like-this level, then you're not trying hard enough. And if you find that you have to rationalise your inability to get it on spurious grounds of categorical rectitude or lexicographical accuracy, then you've lost sight of the issue.

Just kick back and enjoy it, or at least arsing well pipe down and let the rest of us do so. It's either that or I bore you with details of the strange dreams my addled brain has been producing. (Say, floating, be-ice-picked head of Trotsky -- weren't you Greta Garbo on a gnu just a second ago?)



Photos: *Leilani, Stone Cold Crazy, doctorbob, polaroidmemories

Read more...

01 January 2009

New Year audio extravaganza


Firstly, if you can bear to finally leave the year that gave us the cynicism-busting European Championships and that casual Sunday afternoon tennis match back in July (it's actually really hard to be coolly understated about the latter), not to mention Bolt, Phelps, Harrington and Egan, happy new year.

Onwards and, em, backwards. Before the Christmas, I posted a brief video clip of a television appearance by Don Revie and Brian Clough just after Clough had been sacked by Leeds in 1974. After much painstaking research (ah, Google) I found the full audio of the show on the Okey Doke Football blog. Bear in mind that this was the two foremost English managers of the day (when that really meant something), sworn enemies, one of whom was the England manager at the time, both highly controversial, speaking mere hours after Clough's firing. Here's the mp3 (25 KB, 26 mins -- the audio quality is not great but it's still listenable).

A nice surprise while listening to RTE Radio 1 yesterday. The first in the Presidential Lecture Series on the "Ireland of Tomorrow" was delivered by none other than Martin O'Neill. It wasn't so much a lecture in this instance as a pleasant stroll through O'Neill's background in Derry, his experience as an Ulster Catholic in Britain, and his feelings on what it means to be Irish. RTE's website is a bit messy, so if there's an stream, I can't find it, but here's the mp3 (52 KB, 53 mins) if that sort of thing interests you.

Another nice, and somewhat strange, surprise was to be found on the BBC. If you ever wondered what it would sound like if Jarvis Cocker -- the man who I hesitate to call a genius only because I use that word too much as it is (but see this or this or this or this to catch my drift) -- and Johnny Wilkinson -- fly-half extraordinaire, when he's not in I-don't-understand-it-Doctor-I-sneezed-and-every-bone-in-my-body-just-disintegrated mode -- got together to discuss sport, death and Schroedinger's cat, then wonder no more:



And finally: nothing to do with sport -- I just want to pHrEeQuE you out this winter evening:

Read more...

search

twtsiatvstw

  ©Template by Dicas Blogger.